Formulation and Delivery - Chemical
Category: Poster Abstract
												Mikayla M. Smith, MS (she/her/hers)
Graduate Research Assistant
University of Kansas
Lawrence, Kansas, United States
												Mikayla M. Smith, MS (she/her/hers)
Graduate Research Assistant
University of Kansas
Lawrence, Kansas, United States
Michael J. Hageman, Ph.D.
University of Kansas
Lawrence, Kansas, United States
(A) This diagram illustrates ZDV particles suspended in a polymer solution for encapsulation via spray drying. Once the suspension reaches the atomizing nozzle, the solubilized polymer particles will become atomized and will coat the insoluble ZDV particles as they are cooled flowing down the spray dryer. These encapsulated ZDV (eZDV) particles will be collected in the collection chamber. (B) The novel oral in vitro dissolution apparatus adapted from Thi et al. allows for a more accurate representation of the oral environment. The empty column tube allows for a small volume (2.4 mL), as the syringe pump pushes buffer or SSF through the flow-through tubing at 1 mL/min. Collection occurs after the buffer or SSF has completely flowed through the drug-containing column. 
(A) Polymer selection for the encapsulant of ZDV was evaluated by assessing the % release of ZDV from the formulation in 50 mM pH 6.8 phosphate buffer. (B) This figure conveys the impact of changing the polymer ratio, while maintaining drug load, on the % release of ZDV in SSF at pH 7.0. The formulation containing 3:22:75 (EC:EPO:ZDV) represents a polymer ratio of 1:7 (EC:EPO), and the formulation containing 5:20:75 (EC:EPO:ZDV) represents a polymer ratio of 1:4 (EC:EPO). (C) Figure C conveys the impact of drug load on the % release of ZDV in SSF, while maintaining constant polymer ratio. (D) This figure illustrates the impact of NVP addition to create a quaternary formulation on the % release of ZDV in SSF. Polymer ratio is held constant at 1:4 (EC:EPO) for all three of these formulations.
Gastric in vitro release of ZDV from 50 mM pH 4.0 acetic acid buffer was assessed to determine if the inclusion of ethylcellulose (EC) as a nonionic polymer would prevent the release of ZDV in the gastric environment significantly more than the 25:75 (EPO:ZDV) formulation, which does not include EC as a polymer.