Formulation and Delivery - Biomolecular
Category: Poster Abstract
Farhana Islam, BS (she/her/hers)
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Farhana Islam, BS (she/her/hers)
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Ekta Kapoor, MS (she/her/hers)
Graduate Research Assistant
University of Nebraska Medical Center
omaha, Nebraska, United States
Kasturi Siddhanta, MS
University of Nebraska Medical Center
omaha, Nebraska, United States
David Oupický, Ph.D.
University of Nebraska Medical Center
omaha, Nebraska, United States
Figure 1. Physicochemical characterization such as size, PDI and encapsulation efficiency (EE%) of LNP3 and LNP4 for 15 days stored at 4 degrees. Size, PDI and EE% of LNP3 are stable for 15 days (A, B, C); Size, PDI and EE% of LNP4 are stable for 15 days (D, E, F). This study determines the stability of the formulations at 4 degrees.
Figure 2. Biodistribution analysis of LNP 3 in C57BL/6 mice measured by IVIS. 2(A) shows the untreated mice where no signal for luciferase or rhodamine was found; 2(B) shows C57BL/6 mice that were given IP administration of NP 3 formulation. After 24hr of treatment, the mice were imaged by IVIS (both whole-body imaging and organ imaging). Luciferase expression was found in the pancreas and colon and a rhodamine signal was found in the colon after 24hr.
Figure 3. In vitro KPC8060 pancreatic cancer tumor spheroid penetration assay. Spheroid penetration of NP 3 and NP 4 was investigated in comparison to spheroids without treatment and spheroids treated with GFP mRNA along with lipofectamine. Here, Rh (red) indicates the presence of LNPs and GFP (green) indicates protein expression. From this assay, it is found that both LNP 3 and NP 4 formulations can penetrate tumor spheroids and successful GFP mRNA expression into GFP protein.