Discovery and Basic Research
Category: Late Breaking Poster Abstract
												Adeoluwa Adeluola, M.S. (he/him/his)
Graduate Student
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Adeoluwa Adeluola, M.S. (he/him/his)
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Justin Thomas
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Lauren Granchie
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Bryan Remaily
Ohio State University
Columbus, Kentucky, United States
Min Hai
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Gregory Young
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Kyeongmin Kim
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Zhiliang Xie
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Sam Kulp, Ph.D.
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Mitch Phelps, Ph.D.
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Chris Coss, Ph.D.
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Figure 1: Flowchart of Study Design
Figure 2: Concentration-time plots of pembrolizumab in tumor free and tumor bearing mice: Pembro administered IV (A), IP (B) and SC (C) routes. As expected, the results show a steeper slope in the elimination phase when comparing the tumor free and tumor bearing groups. Data are shown as mean ± SD.
Figure 3: Concentration-Time plots showing the absorption phase of Pembrolizumab grouped by tumor status. SC (A) and IP-dosed mice (B) show no difference in the absorption phase between the tumor free and tumor bearing groups. Based on reports by Richter et al (2018), this suggests that FcRn’s function is intact at least on the hematopoietic cells in the tumor bearing model.  Data are shown as mean ± SD.