Formulation and Delivery - Chemical
Category: Late Breaking Poster Abstract
Mihir Ghonge, M.S.
Graduate Student
University of Mississippi
University, Mississippi, United States
Poorva Joshi, Ph.D.
University of Mississippi
Oxford, Mississippi, United States
Ahmed Youssef, Ph.D.
University of Mississippi
Oxford, Mississippi, United States
Corinne Varner, Ph.D.
University of Mississippi
Oxford, Mississippi, United States
Mashan Almutairi, M.S.
Grad Student
University of Mississippi
oxford, Mississippi, United States
Derick Muhindo, Ph.D.
University of Mississippi
University, Mississippi, United States
Narendar Dudhipala, Ph.D.
University of Mississippi
University, Mississippi, United States
Siddharth K. Tripathi, Ph.D.
University of Mississippi
University, Mississippi, United States
												Soumyajit Majumdar, Ph.D.
Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Programs & Professor of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery
University of Mississippi
University, Mississippi, United States
Figure 4. In vitro drug release profile of GTX from GTX-NE, GTX-HME-NE, and commercial solution (control) in relation to the determined MIC90 (mean ± SD, n=3) (p < 0.05)
Figure 5. Transcorneal flux, and permeability of Gatifloxacin from GTX-NE, GTX-HME[1]NE, and Control formulations across isolated rabbit cornea (mean ± SD, n=4) (p < 0.05)