Formulation and Delivery - Biomolecular
Category: Poster Abstract
Richard NL Lamptey, PhD
Assistant Professor
Palm Beach Atlantic University
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Jagdish Singh, Ph.D. (he/him/his)
North Dakota State University
Fargo, North Dakota, United States
Chengwen Sun, Ph.D.
North Dakota State University
Fargo, North Dakota, United States
a. Characterization of PEAS-loaded liposomes for particle size, polydispersity index, and surface charge (zeta potential) b. DNAse protective effect of chitosan-PEAS (N/P 1: 10) loaded liposomal formulation.
1. In vitro cellular viability of A) b.End3 s B) primary astrocytes and C) primary neuronal cells following exposure to PEAS-loaded liposomes at different phospholipid concentrations (50, 100, 200, and 400 nMoles). 2. AT1r gene expression in A) primary neurons, B) primary astrocytes, and C) b.End3 cells at day 7 following transfection of different PEAS-loaded liposomes
. a. Percentage hemolytic activity of PEAS-loaded liposomal formulations. The hemolysis observed with PBS and 1% v/v Triton X-100 was considered as no hemolysis, and 100% hemolysis respectively b. Mean arterial pressure measurements of SHR upon administration of PEAS loaded liposomes c. AT1r mRNA levels in the SHR brain at different time points following PEAS administration with different formulations. Data expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6 biologically independent samples). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001) differences with PBS-treated and naked PEAS treated are shown as (*, **, ***), and (#, ##, ###), respectively