Formulation and Delivery - Chemical
Category: Poster Abstract
Jessica Li, BA
University of the Pacific
Dublin, California, United States
Jessica Li, BA
University of the Pacific
Dublin, California, United States
Landy Gu
University of the Pacific
Stockton, California, United States
Liang Xue, Ph.D.
University of the Pacific
Stockton, California, United States
Bhaskara Jasti, Ph.D. (he/him/his)
University of the Pacific
Stockton, California, United States
												Xiaoling Li, Ph.D. (he/him/his)
Professor
University of the Pacific
Stockton, California, United States
Figure 1. Particle size analysis and visual appearance of Brij 76, Brij 78, and Brij 76:78 (1:1) formulations with respect to time (A & B) and temperature (C &D). 
Figure 2. The differential scanning calorimetry profiles of Brij 76, Brij 78, and Brij 76:78. Temperature range is set from 20°C to 90°C with a scan rate of 1°C/min. 
Figure 3. Turbidimetric results with respect to time and temperature (A) and anti-dilution effect exhibited by both cold-shock and room temperature Brij 76 samples (B). Even after dilution below CMC (~0.0000156 mM), the particle sizes remained nearly the same. However, once the diluted samples were heated back up to 90°C, the particle sizes drastically decreased, indicating that above its Krafft point, the micelles are likely transitioning from a solid to liquid state.